Contact Us
Phone: 708-649-1281
Fax: 708-844-4001
Location
1515 N Harlem Ave
Ste. #205-2
Oak Park, IL 60302
Hours
Call Us
Under the Internal Revenue Code, a certain portion of your income is exempt from tax because some income is necessary just to supply the means of living. In 2017, the amount was $4,050. A taxpayer is entitled to an exemption for one's self, the spouse and each dependent. If the taxpayer pays taxes at 25% to 28%, each exemption claimed results in a tax lower by about $1,000. Thus, it is important for your children to qualify as dependents for your tax return. Also, the presence of a dependent may allow a taxpayer to pay under the lower Head-of-Household" rate. 26 USC 1(b), 2(b). The subject of this page is the rule to qualify as a dependent and how the rule applies to a disabled child drawing governmental benefits.
August 2018 update: The new tax eliminated exemptions, thus squeezing taxpayers who took care of adults with disabilities. Under the prior tax system, in the example above, if a son in the 25% bracket got a full personal exemption for a parent he supported last year, that writeoff saved about $1,000 in tax. The exemption was replaced with a $500 credit (for dependents above the age of 17), which is only half the previous tax reduction. In August 2018 the Internal Revenue Service clarified an issue that further threatened to squeeze caretakers. Under prior law, the person being supported -the dependent- was allowed to have gross income up to the amount of the personal exemption and the caretaker could still claim the relative as a dependent. The repeal of the personal exemption created confusion as to the amount of income limit. In its clarification, the IRS said the dependent relative would be allowed to have income equal to what the personal exemption would have been, after inflation. For 2018, the limit is $4,150.
The rules for a qualified relative other than a child are a little different and are discussed later. The first goal is to meet all five of these tests.
The age requirement of part 3 can be met in any of these ways:
The tricky part is the support test (#4): the child must not have provided over one half of his or her own support during the year when that child is collecting government benefits. When a disabled child reaches the age of 18, and has few assets and little income, he may qualify for SSI. If he has enough work experience, he may qualify for SSDI without checking his income. However, SSI benefits will be reduced if he gets in-kind support, such as free room and board from his parents. Generally, SSI benefits will not be reduced if he pays rent, which shows he is not getting support, but instead paying for his support. Thus, most parents tending for adult child with disabilities living at home charge the child a fair-share assessment of the household expenses. For example, the parents total the amount of rent, food, utilities and other expenses, and, if a family of four, divide the total by four to obtain the fair-share amount. The payment of the fair share amount generally prevents a reduction in SSI benefits.
This solution leads to the dilemma: If the child is providing support, can the parents meet the support test to claim an exemption for the disabled adult child? The IRS provides some guidance in its Publications 17 and 501.
Recently, the IRS provided a look at how to apply the test in a tax court summary opinion, Santos v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, T.C. Summary Opinion 2011-108. The opinion is not a precedent, and thus is not binding on any other case. The results in any situation will depend on all the individual facts there. In Santos, the taxpayer totaled her household expenses for mortgage, property taxes, food, utilities, etc, as $26,783, and thus $13,305 was deemed to be the amount of support she supplied her son. Her son, who was disabled collected $5,420 from Social Security. Since the $5,430 was less than $13,305, he did not supply half of his support, even if the court could rule whether the Social Security benefits could be treated as support he supplied, an issue the court did not decide. The court did decide in Santos that it would be unfair to include Medicaid payments as part of his support. Thus, the taxpayer was entitled to claim her son as a dependent. The court also noted a taxpayer is not precluded from being entitled to a dependency exemption simply because she is not able to prove conclusively the total cost of the child's support
The IRS provides the formula:
To figure if you provided more than half of a person's support, you must first determine the total support provided for that person. Total support includes amounts spent to provide food, lodging, clothing, education, medical and dental care, recreation, transportation, and similar necessities.
Generally, the amount of an item of support is the amount of the expense incurred in providing that item. For lodging, the amount of support is the fair rental value of the lodging.
Expenses that are not directly related to any one member of a household, such as the cost of food for the household, must be divided among the members of the household.
Lodging. If you provide a person with lodging, you are considered to provide support equal to the fair rental value of the room, apartment, house, or other shelter in which the person lives. Fair rental value includes a reasonable allowance for the use of furniture and appliances, and for heat and other utilities that are provided.
Fair rental value defined. This is the amount you could reasonably expect to receive from a stranger for the same kind of lodging. It is used instead of actual expenses such as taxes, interest, depreciation, paint, insurance, utilities, cost of furniture and appliances, etc. In some cases, fair rental value may be equal to the rent paid. If you provide the total lodging, the amount of support you provide is the fair rental value of the room the person uses, or a share of the fair rental value of the entire dwelling if the person has use of your entire home. If you do not provide the total lodging, the total fair rental value must be divided depending on how much of the total lodging you provide. If you provide only a part and the person supplies the rest, the fair rental value must be divided between both of you according to the amount each provides.
To meet this test, which applies to qualifying relatives, a person's gross income for the year must be less than the exemption amount, which in 2017 is $4,050.
You must figure whether you have provided more than half of a person's total support by comparing the amount you contributed to that person's support with the entire amount of support that person received from all sources. This includes support the person provided from his or her own funds.
While Santos noted that "payments received under Medicaid are not necessarily included in determining the support of a claimed dependent," another court may not rule the same way, especially if Medicaid is the entity paying the cost of the group home. This question remains open.
To figure if you provided more than half of a person's support, you must first determine the total support provided for that person.
Any of these relationships that were established by marriage are not ended by death or divorce.
How will this exemption survive in 2018? Maybe not at all. If the gross income test uses an amount of $0.00, can anyone qualify as a qualifying relative? And does it matter, since the amount that the taxpayer can deduct is down to zero anyway.
IRS Circular 230 Disclosure
To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS, we inform you that any U.S. federal tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachments) is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed herein.
Contact us now!
By submitting this form, you agree to be contacted by our law firm, either by phone, text or by email.
Disclaimer: The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute an attorney-client relationship.
© Copyright 2022 | All Rights Reserved | Frank E. Stepnowski | Powered By | Convert IT Marketing | Privacy Policy